U.S. to 'get moving' on asylum cases of separated migrant families

2
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A sign signifying the actual border line between the United States and Mexico is shown on the Cross Border Xpress pedestrian bridge between San Diego and the Tijuana airport© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A sign signifying the actual border line between the United States and Mexico is shown on the Cross Border Xpress pedestrian bridge between San Diego and the Tijuana airport

By Tom Hals

(Reuters) – A U.S. government attorney told a federal judge on Friday the Trump administration would quickly begin to implement an agreement to reconsider asylum for hundreds of families who were separated at the U.S. border with Mexico.

The government agreed this week to settle three lawsuits being overseen by Judge Dana Sabraw, a move that plaintiffs’ attorneys said would allow more than 1,000 immigrant parents and their children to have their asylum claims reconsidered.

“Our point of view is we can get moving on this,” Scott Stewart, a Department of Justice attorney, told Sabraw during a hearing in San Diego.

The lawsuits covered families separated under President Donald Trump’s “zero-tolerance” policy aimed at discouraging illegal immigration. Trump abandoned the policy in June after global outcry over the detention of 2,600 children.

The agreement gives parents and children a second chance to prove they had a “credible fear of persecution or torture” if sent back to their home countries.

Most asylum seekers have traditionally passed credible fear interviews, which prevents quick removal from the United States.

However, lawyers have argued that many parents detained under the zero-tolerance policy failed those interviews because they were traumatized by the separation from their children.

Stewart indicated some individuals could have their asylum claims reconsidered in a matter of weeks. “The government is looking to make sure, wherever it can, to make things go swiftly,” Stewart said.

The settlement must be approved by Sabraw and has to clear procedural hurdles. The judge praised the work of government and the civil rights groups that brought the lawsuits and said he did not expect any delays.

“From the proposed settlement, it appears excellent,” he said.

Soon after Trump abandoned the family separation policy in June, Sabraw issued an injunction that ordered the families reunited and temporarily prevented the administration from deporting them.

On Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions vowed to fight back against federal judges who have used nationwide injunctions to block several of the administration’s policies.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

2 COMMENTS

Comments are closed.